Humanist Discussion Group

Humanist Archives: Feb. 7, 2024, 10:14 a.m. Humanist 37.427 - on the concept of 'tool'

				
              Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 37, No. 427.
        Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne
                      Hosted by DH-Cologne
                       www.dhhumanist.org
                Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org


    [1]    From: Tim Smithers <tim.smithers@cantab.net>
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 37.426: on the concept of 'tool'? (77)

    [2]    From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@mccarty.org.uk>
           Subject: tools (34)


--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2024-02-06 16:46:51+00:00
        From: Tim Smithers <tim.smithers@cantab.net>
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 37.426: on the concept of 'tool'?

Dear Michael,

In case it helps any.

I still like, and have used, in what sounds like similar
circumstances -- conversation starting in a class of
mixed-discipline PhDers -- this, from 2011.

     Bret Victor (2011) A Brief Rant on the Future of
     Interaction Design, 8 November, 2011
     <http://worrydream.com/ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteractionDesign/>

     "A tool addresses human needs by amplifying human
      capabilities."

And pointed people to these two books for what I think is some
useful (more extensive) background reading.

     W Brian Authur, 2009.  The Nature of Technology: What it
     is and how it evolves, London: Allen Lane
     <https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Nature-of-Technology/W-Brian-
Arthur/9781416544067>

and

     Walter G Vincenti, 1990.  What Engineers Know and How
     They Know It, Analytical Studies from Aeronautical
     History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
     <https://press.jhu.edu/books/title/3022/what-engineers-know-and-how-they-
know-it>
     Also
     <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Engineers_Know_and_How_They_Know_It>


I like the way you plan to begin your tools & methods course.
Some talk about tools to put in place some understanding that
tool use needs to be disciplined, and that such discipline may
be provided by a well chosen method, is, in my experience,
often missing in our teachings these days.

Best regards,

Tim



> On 6 Feb 2024, at 08:56, Humanist <humanist@dhhumanist.org> wrote:
>
>
>              Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 37, No. 426.
>        Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne
>                      Hosted by DH-Cologne
>                       www.dhhumanist.org
>                Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
>
>
>
>
>        Date: 2024-02-06 04:12:19+00:00
>        From: Michael Falk <michaelgfalk@gmail.com>
>        Subject: Good reading on the concept 'tool'?
>
> Does anyone have a good suggestion for a short reading for undergraduates on
the
> concept of ‘tool’? I want something to give the students in the first week of
a
> ‘tools and methods’ course, to get them thinking about the nature and value of
> ‘tools’ as opposed to other things we might study – methodologies, systems,
> conceptual frameworks, approaches etc.
>
> My mind says ‘Heidegger’, but that would be a sledgehammer. I’d like a
> conservation-starter rather than a head-scratcher!
>
> Thanks all,
>
> Michael Falk
> University of Melbourne

--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2024-02-07 10:09:37+00:00
        From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@mccarty.org.uk>
        Subject: tools

Dear Michael,

On the philosophical side I can strongly recommend The Tacit Dimension
(1966) by the polymath (scientist and philosopher) Michael Polanyi, well
written and deep. Also Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Phenomenology of
Perception (1962) [Phénomènologie de la perception, 1945] for those who
take to phenomenology--you did mention Heidegger :-).

From engineering: Walter Vincenti, What Engineers Know and How They
Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History (1990), esp. for
introductory purposes, Chapter 1.

From computer science: Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores,
Understanding Computers and Cognition: A new foundation for design
(1987)--in which Heidegger appears; Richard Hamming, "On man's view of
computer science" (1968), his Turing Award lecture.

There's a huge amount of good stuff from writings on the arts and
crafts. I'm away from my physical library at the moment so cannot find
items I know are on the shelves. But note: in his interview by Lex
Fridman, chip designer Jim Keller refers over and over again to building
computers as "craftwork".

A very useful annotated bibliography on this topic could be compiled.

Yours,
WM


--
Willard McCarty,
Professor emeritus, King's College London;
Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews;  Humanist
www.mccarty.org.uk


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php