Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 37, No. 247.
Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne
Hosted by DH-Cologne
www.dhhumanist.org
Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
[1] From: Thomas Gloning <thomas.gloning@germanistik.uni-giessen.de>
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 37.246: admired scholarly editions? (15)
[2] From: Thomas Gloning <thomas.gloning@germanistik.uni-giessen.de>
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 37.246: admired scholarly editions? (86)
--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2023-10-10 20:07:21+00:00
From: Thomas Gloning <thomas.gloning@germanistik.uni-giessen.de>
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 37.246: admired scholarly editions?
> qualities. It would be enlightening to many here, I suspect,
> were these qualities to be identified and discussed.
I understand that Peter Shillingsburg asked for personal opinions.
Nevertheless I would like to point out that there are forms of review
that specifically deal with sholarly editions:
https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/ride/
As is typical for reviews, both quality standards are introduced and
editions are evaluated against those standards. So, analyzing reviews of
scholarly editions in respect of quality standards might be an
additional way of investigating the topic.
All best, Thomas
--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2023-10-10 20:32:15+00:00
From: Thomas Gloning <thomas.gloning@germanistik.uni-giessen.de>
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 37.246: admired scholarly editions?
P.S.: There is also a section with guidelines on criteria for reviewing
scholarly digital editions as a part of the RIDE site, see the first
link below.
There are reviews in other journals as well. Just in case one would like
to build a "Corpus of Reviews of Scholarly Digital Editions" (CRSDE) for
an empirical investigation.
Thomas
English
RIDE is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Institut für
Dokumentologie und Editorik dedicated to digital editions and resources.
RIDE aims to direct attention to digital editions and resources and to
provide a forum in which expert peers criticise and discuss the efforts
of digital editors in order to improve current practices and advance
future developments. Reviewers are expected to discuss not only the
traditional achievements ands problems of editions, corpora, etc. in
general, but also to address the developing methodology its technical
implications. To this end, the IDE developed a comprehensive catalogues
of criteria for the review of digital resources guiding the reviewers:
* Criteria for Reviewing Scholarly Digital Editions
<https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/weitereschriften/criteria-version-1-1/>
* Criteria for Reviewing Text Collections
<https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/weitereschriften/criteria-text-
collections-version-1-0/>
* Criteria for Reviewing Tools and Environments for Digital Scholarly
Editing
<https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/weitereschriften/criteria-tools-
version-1/>
Read more about RIDE at ride.i-d-e.de <http://ride.i-d-e.de>.
Issues published
* Issue 14 <http://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-14/>: Scholarly Editions
(published November 2021, /rolling issue/)
* Issue 13 <http://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-13/>: Scholarly Editions
(published December 2020)
* Issue 12 <http://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-12/>: Scholarly Editions
(Correspondence) (published July 2020)
* Issue 11 <http://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-11/>: Tools and
Environments (published January 2020)
* Issue 10 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-10/>: Scholarly
Editions (Correspondence) (published June 2019)
* Issue 9 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-9/>: Text Collections
(published November 2018)
* Issue 8 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-8/>: Text Collections
(published February 2018)
* Issue 7 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-7/>: Scholarly Editions
(published December 2017)
* Issue 6 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-6/>: Text Collections
(published September 2017)
* Issue 5 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-5/>: Scholarly Editions
(published February 2017)
* Issue 4 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issue-4>: Scholarly Editions
(published June 2016)
* Issue 3 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issue-3>: Scholarly Editions
(published November 2015)
* Issue 2 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issue-2>: Scholarly Editions
(published December 2014)
* Issue 1 <https://ride.i-d-e.de/issue-1>: Scholarly Editions
(published June 2014)
Am 10.10.2023 um 22:07 schrieb Thomas Gloning:
>
>> qualities. It would be enlightening to many here, I suspect,
>> were these qualities to be identified and discussed.
>
> I understand that Peter Shillingsburg asked for personal opinions.
> Nevertheless I would like to point out that there are forms of review
> that specifically deal with sholarly editions:
>
> https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/ride/
>
> As is typical for reviews, both quality standards are introduced and
> editions are evaluated against those standards. So, analyzing reviews
> of scholarly editions in respect of quality standards might be an
> additional way of investigating the topic.
>
> All best, Thomas
>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
