Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 36, No. 115. Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne Hosted by DH-Cologne www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org Date: 2022-08-02 05:49:59+00:00 From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@mccarty.org.uk> Subject: human-machine relations This is at least equally a question for the uninitiated as for any experts in human-computer interaction: what figures of thought (a.k.a. metaphors) get us further in understanding our relation with computing machinery? Bill Buxton (computer science) and Alessandro Duranti (linguistics), for example, have talked about musical performance, improvisational jazz in particular. This appeals to me because it opens up a connection with the arts. What others are there, and what promise do they offer? It's essential to remember, I think, that (to paraphrase Dr Johnson) metaphor yokes two things by violence together. In other words, two very different things, bringing the friction of the interplay between identity and difference into focus. My doctoral mentor used to quote the biblical "Joseph is a fruitful bough" as an example that makes difference hard to ignore--Joseph clearly isn't a fruitful bough--while inviting us to consider that in another sense he is. This suggests to me that for computing machinery difference from the human is the better, more rewarding goal, but that at the same time we need ever better likenesses. So, how do we think about our machines in order to make the most sense of them? More than 'just a machine' in Minsky's 'precomputational' sense, I'd think. Comments? Yours, WM -- Willard McCarty, Professor emeritus, King's College London; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews; Humanist www.mccarty.org.uk _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php