Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 35, No. 94. Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne Hosted by DH-Cologne www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org Date: 2021-06-18 14:39:12+00:00 From: Dr. Herbert Wender <drwender@aol.com> Subject: Re: [Humanist] 35.92: theory? Awaiting the recommendations of the experts (Dino Buzzetti?) I wold like to ask if meanwhile the old compendium of Stegmüller has found a successsor? Cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Stegm%C3%BCller - Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschafttheorie und Analytischen Philosophie - Band I, Erklärung-Begründung-Kausalität, 1983 - Band II, Theorie und Erfahrung, 1974 - 1. Teilband: Theorie und Erfahrung, 1974 - 2. Teilband: Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, 1985 - 3. Teilband: Die Entwicklung des neuen Strukturalismus seit 1973, 1986 - Band III, Strukturtypen der Logik, 1984 - Band IV, Personelle und statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit, 1973 - 1. Halbband: Personelle Wahrscheinlichkeit und rationale Entscheidung, 1973 - 2. Halbband: Statistisches Schließen - Statistische Begründung - Statistische Analyse, 1973 Kind regards, Herbert -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Humanist <humanist@dhhumanist.org> An: drwender@aol.com Verschickt: Fr, 18. Jun. 2021 7:30 Betreff: [Humanist] 35.92: theory? Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 35, No. 92. Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne Hosted by DH-Cologne www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org Date: 2021-06-17 13:00:15+00:00 From: James Rovira <jamesrovira@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Humanist] 35.90: theory? I can't explain what makes a great question, but this is a great question. I would hazard that a great question is only one that I haven't asked myself before but that piques my interest, especially if it hasn't come up in my reading. A question that could be inferred from my reading but not necessarily directly stated is a good question, and a question that's already answered in the reading is a bad one. I suspect you're going to find the same *kinds *of differences across the same *kinds *of disciplines with fewer differences among different fields within those disciplines. So "theory" in humanities will have many of the same kinds of differences and similarities across different areas of the humanities, and the same may be true of the sciences. Looking forward to other responses, though. Jim R > Perhaps someone here can help. I'm looking for a discussion of 'theory' > that recognises the differences across disciplines. Any recommendations? > > Thanks. > > Yours, > WM _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php