Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 35, No. 359. Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne Hosted by DH-Cologne www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org Date: 2021-11-17 06:58:13+00:00 From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@mccarty.org.uk> Subject: contributions from robotics & from alerts to neuroculturalism I've just finished reading How Human is Human? The View from Robotics Research by Hiroshi Ishiguro -- or, as he writes his name, Ishiguro Hiroshi -- a highly respected and well known Japanese roboticist. I recommend the book highly for his subtle, probing reflections on how the human-robot relation is affected by all that we take in through our senses, principally sight and sound, as one would expect, but also touch and smell. He has tirelessly experimented with his generations of robots, first to make them as much like us in appearance as possible, then radically to simplify them to minimalist but affective human form. Their speech and behaviour are controlled remotely by human operators, and there -- I was surprised -- the brilliance of his experiments lies. His informal, relaxed, self-reflective style makes reading the book a pleasure, but it also has, I think, quite a bit to do with the subtlety of his argument. His technical papers on 'android science' I find much less interesting, but your mileage may differ. Anyhow, searching for that term will bring you to these papers. We are combarded by various expressions of the abstracted criteria of AI research. These have, I suspect, played no small role in desentising us to the profound effects of sensory input on our relation and conception of 'intelligent' machinery. The senses open the door to the emotional dimensions of this relation. Two further books thus come to mind. The first is Rosalind Picard's Affective Computing (1997), which I think I've already mentioned. The second is actually a pair of books, more recent discoveries: Francisco Ortega and Fernando Vidal, eds., Neurocultures: Glimpses into an Expanding Universe (2011), and Vidal and Ortega, Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject (2017). These help to understand how it is that we come to ignore that which Ishiguro is paying such delightful and informing attention to. Reduction of being to the brain, and so the runaway success of e.g. neuroimaging, obscures so much else! But enough for this morning. Much to read. Comments? Yours, WM -- Willard McCarty, Professor emeritus, King's College London; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews; Humanist www.mccarty.org.uk _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php