Humanist Archives: Sept. 18, 2021, 6:13 a.m. Humanist 35.247 - consequences, or not reading it all
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 35, No. 247.
Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne
Hosted by DH-Cologne
Submit to: email@example.com
Date: 2021-09-17 10:56:56+00:00
From: David Zeitlyn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: [Humanist] 35.242: consequences, or how we work
I am increasingly unsympathetic to injunctions to read all of a text
before citing it,
since the time spent doing so could perhaps be spent reading other
texts more useful to me.
Implicit in a decision to read book Y is a decision NOT to read book Z.
I am in favour of at least considering, looking into Book Z
I leave for others to decide whether one should cite a book hurled
across the room in irritation and then abandoned
or one in which there is a useful nugget or discussion, accessed though
an index which has at least some independence from the rest of the text
Davidz writing as a magpie, all too conscious that more is published
even in small subject areas than any one person can ever read...
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: email@example.com
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php