Humanist Archives: Aug. 13, 2021, 6:29 a.m. Humanist 35.186 - more pointy-bracket speculations
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 35, No. 186.
Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne
Hosted by DH-Cologne
Submit to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Date: 2021-08-12 12:32:30+00:00
From: Henry Schaffer <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 35.184: early morning pointy-bracket explorations
> Date: 2021-08-11 10:30:03+00:00
> From: Willard McCarty <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: test
> Dear colleagues,
> My thanks to those who, cleverer than I, have suggested means
> to probe the pointy-bracket problem, for example by writing as
> This is a <i>yet another</i> <b>test</b>. <u>Please ignore</u>!
> If, above, you see two incomplete sentences, then we know that
> an anti-HTML code is lurking.
I see two complete sentences with markup of italics, bold and underlined.
That's fine HTML, but when Jim Rovira wrote
Does <- this -> work, or < this >?
I also saw all 5 words, and those pointy brackets aren't valid HTML markup.
So I've been wondering who gets the incomplete material.
> I've just discovered (1) that the above is correctly interpreted as
> HTML in the first stage of processing, producing italicised, a
> bolded and underlined words, and
> (2) that an expression of the form
Hmm - what about <anything> ??
> do not survive the first stage of processing. This does indeed
> suggest that only valid HTML markup is allowed. Hmm.
I'm using Safari (14.1.2) on a Mac OS X 11.5 (Big Sur).
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: email@example.com
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php