Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 35, No. 125. Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne Hosted by DH-Cologne www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org Date: 2021-07-04 17:18:24+00:00 From: scholar-at-large@bell.net <scholar-at-large@bell.net> Subject: Oppositional AI and Consulting Oracles Willard I have been mulling over your recent incitement to think about the possibility of oppositional AI. In the background to this mulling is Sherry Turkle's characterization of the "robotic moment" in _Alone Together_. One of the key components of that moment is the human accommodation. Turkle : "Even before we make the robots, we remake ourselves as people ready to be their companions."[1] What arose to mind in reading Turkle and contemplating your desiderata, was a possible hint in the structure of the algorithms of divination (at least of textual divination: Ifa, I Ching, Sortes Biblicae). In a sense the human inquirer molds their behaviour to receive guidance from the divination machine. - The initial step is to focus on the question, to concentrate on clarification. - The next step is to use a random event generator to select navigation of the textual corpus. - Then the human user reads text (or recites proverb) selected through random operator. - The selected text is interpreted in light of the question - The steps are re-enacted to seek further guidance if the oracle proves mystifying. The point I want to emphasize here is that the oracle machines are not necessarily approached as living beings (as in Turkle's robotic moment) but that the human expectation of a sense-making response sets the stage for disappointment. Which leads me to my question: how much does human disappointment play a role in your imagining of oppositional AI? Without the propensity for humans to be disappointed in the flow of semiosis (unmet expectations of semantic fulness), can the AI be truly oppositional? [1] https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Robotic-Moment-2118595 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ François Lachance Scholar-at-large Wannabe Professor of Theoretical and Applied Rhetoric http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~lachance https://berneval.hcommons.org to think is often to sort, to store and to shuffle: humble, embodied tasks _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php