Humanist Archives: March 20, 2021, 7:23 a.m. Humanist 34.290 - pubs: Wittgenstein; the algorithm concept
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 34, No. 290.
Department of Digital Humanities, University of Cologne
Hosted by DH-Cologne
Submit to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Date: 2021-03-19 09:42:19+00:00
From: Willard McCarty
Subject: two new from CI
Many here will, I suspect, be glad for the following articles in
Critical Inquiry 47 (Spring 2021). I quote the last few sentences from each.
Lydia H. Liu, "Wittgenstein in the machine" (pp. 425-55)
> To conclude, what does the machine modeling of the philosophical
> distinction between ideograph and logos accomplish? The answer is
> that the machine sets a contextually-based analysis of semantic
> patterns in motion; it means that the machine promises to measure up
> to the ambiguity and multiplicity of word meanings, analogies,
> metaphors, human creativity, and fallibility in language use; and it
> means that machine learning and AI technologies have been part of a
> major philosophical breakthrough even if their practitioners remain
> unaware of it. In that sense, the computable thesaurus is the
> philosophy machine Masterman and her team invented to bring the
> post-Wittgensteinian philosophy of language into being.
Mingyi Yu, "The algorithm concept, 1684-1958" (pp. 592-609)
> Tarrying with the algorithm concept’s deep history shifts the focus
> from that concept’s ﬁxation on automation to an assessment of the
> conditions which lead it to be framed in that way. More importantly,
> it also provides an opening for the expanded critical imaginaries for
> what else an algorithm could be.
Read them tonight!
Professor emeritus, King's College London;
Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews; Humanist
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: email@example.com
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php