Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 33, No. 751. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: 2020-04-10 07:00:35+00:00 From: Norman Gray
Subject: on academia.edu [The following note rested in limbo for a time. --WM] Greetings. Ken Friedman wrote: People can only do so much with their time. I do research. I edit a journal, which is available open access on the World Wide Web. I make my own documents and teaching resources available on Academia. I'm not prepared to manage a web site just so that people who don't like Academia can read me. And quite right, too! Only a minority of academics should be managing their own website. That's partly because they have better things to do, and partly because the things that make an academic website valuable are fussy things to do with long-term curation, which are both more important, and harder to do correctly, than most folk expect. A personally hosted website is the fourth-best option here. The third-best option might be a site like academia.edu. I don't have strong opinions about them, but although I see no evidence that they're wicked, they don't give a very positive impression to me personally. There's more one could say here. The very best option is a disciplinary repository such as arxiv.org and its imitators, but not every discipline has one of those (I think journals have a defensible function of being the zeroth-best option in terms of curation and preservation, but let's leave those out of this discussion about ways one can manage this as an individual). The second-best option is... the library. As librarians repeatedly remind us, their job is not fundamentally about books, but about information dissemination, and the library, or a library consortium, is _the_ place on campus which should be managing an institutional repository. If your institution doesn't have one, then the most productive thing to do might not be to start a website of your own, but to work out how, bureaucratically or administratively, to help the library start. Your enquiry may be the n-th quantum of 'evidence of community demand' that (to their jubilation) gets them to a winning case for local funding. An institution which _doesn't_ have such a repository should be asked some penetrating questions from its staff, starting with 'why not?' Speaking personally, I think it looks bad for an institution if they support their academics so poorly, that they have to go to academia.edu to disseminate their non-journal work (this isn't a dig at academia.edu: they'd have to be garlanded in roses before I thought they were a better solution than an academic library of some sort). Of course, this remark doesn't help if you're working outside of an institution (I omit a mass of other qualifications and hedges from the above). Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: email@example.com List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.