Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 33, No. 178. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: 2019-08-11 21:11:37+00:00 From: Dr. Herbert Wender
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 33.174: yellow stickies Since Francois, inspired by a statement in "Queer Phenomenology", "had fun imagining what objects surround digital humanists in their work spaces", my thoughts was going from outside to inside the heads of digital humanists at work. A remarkably new approach in the field of scholarly editing of literary works was just pubished by Paul Eggert in the new volume of ESTS's Variants (cf.Humanist 33.131-2 [Variants 14]): In the activities of editing scholars, says Eggert, are potentially involved two opposite 'impulses', and he proposes to span a horizontal scroll-bar from the left ("archival impulse") to the right ("editorial impulse"). In this model, he argues, for each mix of these impulses in a given editorial effort can be determined a certain slider-position. If I understand the model correctly, for Pasley's critical edition of Kafka's "Proze" the slider is to be placed widely to the right side while the alternative facs&trascript edition by Reuss/Staengle holds an extreme leftist position. Somewhere around the mid-point I wuold see Gabler's "Ulysses" and the newly presented difital FaustEdition (with a combination of archival representations in two parts of the web-site - "Archiv" & "Genese" - and a reading text in the third). In contrast to Sahle's conceptualization of digital editions who takes *all* types as representational, Eggert sees only on the left side of the scroll-bar re-presentations which will document extant text forms witnessing textual transmission while on the other side 'editorial' editions (the 'true' editions?) were to be taken as presentations: of *new* textual forms not extant before the actual critical editorial effort. The notational consequence of such a psychological approach: to differentiate between more or less 'archival' or 'editorial' editions - sounds a bit strange. Furthermore I would deny any real sense in the use of the notion "archive" in a discussion about editors; editions have to bring multiplied texts in actual use, archives hold (normally unpublished, in most cases unique) out-of-use documents accessible on demand, libraries preserve published materials, normally one copie out of a printing run. But the proposal to differentiate presentational and re-presentational efforts is inspiring. Maybe the diversity of editorial efforts could be theorized along Aristotle's three-partitioning of rhetorial orientations (to the past, the present, the future : forensic, epideictic, deliberative rhetoric; analogously 1. stemmatic and geneticÂ analyses, 2. documentary editing (facs&transript), 3. constitution of reading texts) Coming back to the mind-states of editing wo/men: I suppose that the shift of attention from the will of the author to the will of the editor is not really welcome. Or would someone go further on, from impulses to drives, from psychology to Psycho-analyses? Asking about the drive to power behind the impulse to dominate the editorial discourse on canonized literary works, to establish a canonical form for such a work... Thatts a very wide field including anal fixations and order obsessions... And not at least were to remember the motto-like fictive Alfieri/Gozzi questtions: "E la fama?"/"E la fame?" (Georg Buechner, "Leonce und Lena"; surely inspired by Georges Sand, as Fellrath has stated.) I see just a second scroll- bar: from the bottom ("fame") to the on top ("fama"). But I forgot the division of labour between editors on top and the paid helpers (markup included). Forget the vertical scroll-bar! Greetings, Herbert ----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Date: 2019-08-08 21:56:17+00:00 > From: Dr. Herbert Wender > Subject: Re: [Humanist] 33.169: yellow stickies? Not to forget all those instruments of torture-pleasure in the queery backrooms of electronically enhanced intellectuaism: I beware in the souterrain of our house an IMSAI (CP/M on Intel 8086) filling the half of a desk, a portable KAYPRO II, two ATARI (one with external hard-drive), a full-equiped NEXT-Station and some wracked MS-PCs. Probably the messy collection says something about my mind but I hope that this doesn't infect my postings ;-) Herbert -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Date: 2019-08-07 00:46:41+00:00 > From: Francois Lachance > Subject: Is there a yellow sticky in the corner of your screen? Willard I have had fun imagining what objects surround digital humanists in their work spaces after reading Sara Ahmed quote, in Queer Phenomenology, Diana Fuss [quote] the theatre of composition is not an empty space but a place animated by artifacts, momentos, machines, books, and furniture that frame any intellectual labour. (2004, The Sense of an Interior: Four Writers and the Rooms that Shaped Them) [/quote] -- Francois Lachance Scholar-at-large http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~lachance https://berneval.hcommons.org _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: email@example.com List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.