Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 17, No. 250.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/
www.princeton.edu/humanist/
Submit to: humanist@princeton.edu
[1] From: lachance@origin.chass.utoronto.ca (Francois (27)
Lachance)
Subject: Re: 17.249 the blind man's knowing
[2] From: lhomich <lhomich@ualberta.ca> (9)
Subject: RE: 17.249 the blind man's knowing
--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:45:32 +0100
From: lachance@origin.chass.utoronto.ca (Francois Lachance)
Subject: Re: 17.249 the blind man's knowing
Willard,
The researcher as individual may lead to the adoption of the blind man
analogy. As you invite subscribers :
> proceed with inadequate guidance. Vincenti likens the engineer-researcher
> (include yourself in this noble company) to a blind man with a cane walking
> down an unfamiliar street, not randomly, not without purpose,
> intelligence or direction, but blindly, learning as he can from the taps of
> his cane. This is us.
I read a plural in that "us" that undermines the analogy.
I'm intrigued how Donald T. Campbell's work could underwrite the move to
the blind man analogy (yes, there is the use of the term _blind_). I think
there is quite a leap from "blind variation" - not knowing which variation
might be selected - to a disquisition on randmoness and purpose as
figured by the navigation of the blind person. I think it is imperative
to distinguish between the generation of variations and the selection of
variations. .
Campbell's work in epistemology also highlights "vicarious selectors". For
relevant links, see a Campbell obituary by F. Heylighen, accessible online
from Principia Cybernetica
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CAMPBEL.html
If "us" is a system,
then some of "us" produces variation by blind trial-and-error
and some of "us" selects some of those variations for retention.
Of course the "us" system can be embodied in one individual who can both
play and adjudicate.
-- Francois Lachance, Scholar-at-large http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~lachance--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:46:01 +0100 From: lhomich <lhomich@ualberta.ca> Subject: RE: 17.249 the blind man's knowing
Dear Colleagues:
'The blind man's knowing' (17.249) got me thinking about the parable of the blind men and the elephant: no one thinks to ask the elephant's opinion about being felt up by strangers. In our explorations, we can always ask what effect we are having, and proceed with careful consideration for subject and territory. Although we may be 'blind' (perhaps 'ignorant' would be a better word?), we are not senseless.
Eric Homich M.A. student, Humanities Computing / English University of Alberta
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:58:12 EDT