12.0544 guidelines for evaluation?

Humanist Discussion Group (humanist@kcl.ac.uk)
Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:46:43 +0100 (BST)

Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 12, No. 544.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
<http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
<http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>

Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 21:51:42 +0100
From: Tom Davis <davisct@appstate.edu>
Subject: Guidelines for Evaluation of Faculty Using Technology

I am the chairman of a committee here at
Appalachian that has been given the task
of compiling guidelines to be used by
Deans and Chairpersons when they evaluate
faculty involvement with technology. The
basic problem is how does one recognize
various involvements in the use of technology
as meritorious when compared with traditional
forms of scholarship? If anyone has formulated
such guidelines, I would appreciate your
forwarding me a copy. It would be nice not to
have to re-invent the wheel, so to speak.


----------------------
Charles T. ("Tom")Davis
Philosophy and Religion Department
Appalachian State University
Boone, North Carolina
davisct@appstate.edu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humanist Discussion Group
Information at <http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>
<http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
=========================================================================