6.0435 Rs: On Bibliographies To Be Kept on Line ... (4/76)
Elaine Brennan (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:05:48 EST
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 6, No. 0435. Tuesday, 12 Jan 1993.
(1) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 12:56:30 -0500 (25 lines)
From: cwoodill@epas.utoronto.ca (Christopher Woodill)
Subject: Re: 6.0427 Rs: Bibliograpies online? (1/67)
(2) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 21:50:23 EST (12 lines)
From: lenoblem@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Lenoble Michel)
Subject: WHY DON'T WE (Part II)
(3) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:20 EST (13 lines)
From: "Peter Graham, Rutgers U., (908) 932-2741"
<GRAHAM@ZODIAC.BITNET>
Subject: Re: 6.0427 Rs: Bibliograpies online? (1/67)
(4) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 19:57:47 PST (26 lines)
From: calcaris%nic.cerf.net%cerf.net@Sdsc.BITnet (susan calcari)
Subject: How to get info on FTP server at NIH
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 12:56:30 -0500
From: cwoodill@epas.utoronto.ca (Christopher Woodill)
Subject: Re: 6.0427 Rs: Bibliograpies online? (1/67)
>
> 1) People keep their bibl. refs. in 50 different formats, from a
> word processor file (WP, Word, NB, etc. etc.) to a variety of
> bibl. programs (Pro-Cite, Papyrus, Library Manager, NB's Ibid,
> and a dozen others we can all name off the tops of our heads).
> A common repository would *either* have to be straight ascii
> *or* use an agreed program. Since we'd be retrieving cites
> through the network, common sense dictates straight ascii but
> in a set format that could be poured into a variety of bibl.
> bibl. formatting programs (does such a format exist?)
>
In using telecommunication programs, we have programs for converting
BBS lists into various formats for dialing directories for different
programs (ie. Telix, procomm, etc.) which have different formats.
Could not such a program be written for this case as well? You could
scan in standard bibligraphic formats or standard data base files, and
then get the program to convert them to any desired format.
Christopher
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------40----
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 21:50:23 EST
From: lenoblem@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Lenoble Michel)
Subject: WHY DON'T WE (Part II)
To give one more detail about the idea I had that we, HUMANIST,
should find a way of making OUR OWN bibliographies available to
the rest of the research community, let me just say that by OUR
OWN I meant the articles, papers and books we may have written
ourselves and not the bibliographies we might have gathered. The
ultimate goal was to be able to ask any member of the list for a
e-copy of his/her text to be sent to us by e-mail. More ideas?
--
(3) --------------------------------------------------------------------
===============================================================================
Michel Lenoble |
Litterature Comparee | NOUVELLE ADRESSE - NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS
Universite de Montreal | ---> lenoblem@ere.umontreal.ca
C.P. 6128, Succ. "A" |
MONTREAL (Quebec) | Tel.: (514) 288-3916
Canada - H3C 3J7 |
===============================================================================
======================================================================== 19
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:20 EST
From: "Peter Graham, Rutgers U., (908) 932-2741" <GRAHAM@ZODIAC.BITNET>
Subject: Re: 6.0427 Rs: Bibliograpies online? (1/67)
--Peter Graham, Rutgers University Libraries
Rather than creating a bibliography list, with all the potential problems
and ambiguities Judy Koren mentioned, it might be preferable to do something
librarians have talked about from time to time: use the existing
bibliographic utilities, and provide fields which allow annotation according
to use of the bib. record. I.e. bring quality indicators to the bib.
records. Pages of illustration.
(4) --------------------------------------------------------------52----
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 19:57:47 PST
From: calcaris%nic.cerf.net%cerf.net@Sdsc.BITnet (susan calcari)
Subject: How to get info on FTP server at NIH
Re: the recent discussion of a collective bibliography, here's a possible
host. --John Unsworth
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:25:07 EST
From: Roger Fajman <RAF@cu.nih.GOV>
Subject: RE: DELPHI connects to the Internet
We have an anonymous FTP service here on CU.NIH.GOV. Any user is able
to create a directory and make anything they want available. We have
other agencies as users too. For example, GAO has made some of their
reports available, as has the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The same files are also available through an email server. For
information on how to use the server, send email with HELP as the body
or subject to SERVER@CU.NIH.GOV or SERVER@NIHCU (BITNET). Note that
this is not a LISTSERV.
Roger Fajman Telephone: +1 301 402 1246
National Institutes of Health BITNET: RAF@NIHCU
Bethesda, Maryland, USA Internet: RAF@CU.NIH.GOV