5.0194 Notes: E-Mail; E-Boom; Humanist Numbers (3/35)
Elaine Brennan & Allen Renear (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Wed, 26 Jun 91 21:54:54 EDT
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 5, No. 0194. Wednesday, 26 Jun 1991.
(1) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 91 13:37 BST (10 lines)
From: DAVID BARRY <UBJV649@CU.BBK.AC.UK>
Subject: RE Email for job searches
(2) Date: 25 Jun 91 23:21:26 EST (14 lines)
From: James O'Donnell <JODONNEL@PENNSAS>
Subject: e-boom?
(3) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 91 09:01:17 EDT (11 lines)
From: Elaine M Brennan <ELAINE@BROWNVM>
Subject: Jim O'Donnell's Query
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 91 13:37 BST
From: DAVID BARRY <UBJV649@CU.BBK.AC.UK>
Subject: RE Email for job searches (vol 5 no 0167 Dana Cartwright
It is useful to point out that confidentiality of email is limited in the
same way that the phone is (and you get fax wrong numbers too),
however I would point out that the sheer volume of mail is liable to
protect against the nosiness of the systems programmer!
David Barry, Birkbeck College.
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------17----
Date: 25 Jun 91 23:21:26 EST
From: James O'Donnell <JODONNEL@PENNSAS>
Subject: e-boom?
I have the purely subjective impression that the accession of new names
to e-world is taking a marked upward turn. Old friends keep turning up
at a faster rate than in the past couple of years: as though this was
the year we got to the end of the year and a *lot* of people thought,
well, about time I got an e-mail account. Are there hard figures for
academic e-mail usage, BITNET or INTERNET or whatever? Do Ellen and
Allen keep a chart of accessions to HUMANIST? Is this the millennium
already?
Jim O'Donnell
Classics, U. of Penn
(3) --------------------------------------------------------------14----
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 91 09:01:17 EDT
From: Elaine M Brennan <ELAINE@BROWNVM>
Subject: Jim O'Donnell's Query
I checked the Humanist count this morning: it stood at 1,058 -- with 28
of those being redistribution sites, accounting for something more than
28 readers among them. (At Brown the list is generally subscribed to by
somewhere between 15 and 35 people, for example).
Elaine