3.817 copyright, cont. (47)
Willard McCarty (MCCARTY@vm.epas.utoronto.ca)
Sun, 3 Dec 89 21:01:13 EST
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 3, No. 817. Sunday, 3 Dec 1989.
(1) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 89 10:00:00 EST (10 lines)
From: EIEB360@UTXVM
Subject: 3.807 copyright, cont. (51) (John Slatin)
(2) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 89 13:44:13 CST (17 lines)
From: "Michael S. Hart" <HART@UIUCVME>
Subject: Re: 3.809 copyright, cont. (38)
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 89 10:00:00 EST
From: EIEB360@UTXVM
Subject: 3.807 copyright, cont. (51) (John Slatin)
In response to Robert Amsler's suggestion that the problem with
copyright is that people keep trying to find a way not to pay for the
information they use-- well, maybe. But scholarship depends on free
access to information; even now, publishers recognize (however
grudgingly) the notion of "fair use," and I'd hate to see tht disappear.
John Slatin
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------25----
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 89 13:44:13 CST
From: "Michael S. Hart" <HART@UIUCVME>
Subject: Re: 3.809 copyright, cont. (38)
re: KESSLER <IME9JFK@OAC.UCLA.EDU>'s comments about audio tape, etc.
When audio tape was introduced, the advertisements and manuals showed
examples suggesting the user, for example, buy an RCA record-RCA tape
recorder-RCA tape and demonstrating how these were to be set up, used
and not abused to copy the record purchased from RCA. (RCA is only a
time-worn example - I should also use JVC with them - especially with
the four channel era, and the Sony-CBS alliance, etc).
The issue of copyright has only arisen as the quality of recordings.
I, myself, tend to confine my comments about ASCII copying to things
which have become public domain. mh