21.026 peer-review criteria?

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:08:20 +0100

                Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 21, No. 26.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:32:41 +0100
         From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
         Subject: peer-review criteria?

I'd very much appreciate help in locating lists and discussions of
criteria for the peer-review of digital scholarly objects. In
simplest form, such criteria overlap with those for evaluating
websites, but what I'm really interested in is how one might go about
reviewing complex digital objects. Best would be those at a
sufficiently high level of abstraction as to suit whatever one might
encounter, but those specific to particular kinds of objects would
also be quite useful, as would articles on the process of reviewing
digital objects.

Many thanks.


Dr Willard McCarty | Reader in Humanities Computing | Centre for
Computing in the Humanities | King's College London |
Received on Wed May 16 2007 - 03:19:41 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 16 2007 - 03:19:41 EDT