Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 18, No. 7.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: email@example.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:01:49 +0100
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Francois Lachance)
Subject: Re: A not unhappy 17th BIRTHDAY
I do believe you short change yourself. Modesty in the face of the
mathematicians arises from on slight preposition "in" placed between "to
think" and "the abstract"...
> *about* anything at all? mathematics requires an extraordinary ability to
> think in the abstract that I, for one, do not possess. But mathematics is
> (as mathematicans are wont to say) “beautiful”, and more importantly for
> us, computation is deeply rooted in mathematical questions. So, sooner or
Someone in the last century wrote:
Abstraction transports one from the given to the possible. As
abstraction moves away from an underlying reality, a putative last
instance, it moves towards a form, a portable pattern, a template.
Abstraction is akin to transcoding. In the succession of analytic and
synthetic moments, in the movements of separation and recombination, a
materialism is feasible, thought and bodily patterns readable.
I am willing to venture that that writer thought about mathematicians as
thinking through the abstract or with the abstract. For examples of the
incarnatory power of mathematics, see the lovely illustrations and process
descriptions in _Fragments of Infinity: A Kaleidoscope of Math and Art_ by
Ivars Peterson (John Wiley & Sons, 2001)
Good thing you don't possess the ability to think in the abstract. I
probably enables you to think through and with the abstract.
-- Francois Lachance, Scholar-at-large http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~lachance
A calendar is like a map. And just as maps have insets, calendars in the 21st century might have 'moments' expressed in flat local time fanning out into "great circles" expressed in earth revolution time.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 10 2004 - 16:15:51 EDT